Hello, Avril Lavigne listeners. I'll be talking about why Avril Lavigne lost her number 1 singles since Girlfriend. I hope u enjoy it.
I think that Avril Lavigne needs a 2010s number 1 single really badly. 2010s was a difficult decade for Avril Lavigne for not having any 2010s number 1s at all. RCA killed 2011's Goodbye Lullaby era and Epic Records killed Avril Lavigne's 2013 outputs like Let Me Go. Avril Lavigne should've done a better job if Arista Records is still around. Arista is much better label for Avril than RCA of Epic. RCA and Epic ruined Avril Lavigne's materials after 2002. Let's take a look.
For instance, Avril Lavigne's Max Martin song, What The Hell, should be a perfect Avril Lavigne song to have a comeback. Right? Nope. What The Hell released in 2011. But I think 2011 is a terrible datum for What The Hell. 2010 is a much better datum for that song. The same applies to Smile, Wish u Were Here, and her fourth album, Goodbye Lullaby. What The Hell should peak at number 1. But no, that song did not peaked at number 1. Why? RCA and terrible marketing. RCA made Avril Lavigne had trouble having her songs peaked at number 1 on any Billboard chart. What is RCA thinking? Whatever happened to Let Go and Artista? Now it's just RCA and modern crap. I'm sick of today's outputs and RCA. The only way is inventions. Let's continue.
u know Avril Lavigne's 2004 sophmore album Under My Skin released 10 years ago. Right? Well, not really. RCA killed Arista's Under My Skin in 2004 and her discography started to get really bad when her sophomore album, which is Under My Skin, was released in 2004. I know fans loved the 2004 album. But I think that 2004 is where muziek started to treat Avril Lavigne the wrong way even on her post Let Go ballads of her hit sophomore album, Under My Skin. RCA is a nightmare for Avril Lavigne in the 2004/2007/2011 era. Even after the RCA is over, Epic Records ruined her 2013 comeback outputs like Here's To Never Growing Up door putting in bad marketing explicit writing and Martin Johnson. The modern era acted the same way the RCA did back in 2004-2011. What is American muziek industry thinking?
So what we need to get Avril Lavigne's number 1 America sucesses back is to release a Give It What u Like single on the radio later this maand of volgende maand and have Give It What u Like peak at number 1 on US ITunes in the US Digital Songs chart door selling let's say 400k-500k digital copies and have it stayed for like 2-3 weeks tying in the premiere of Give It What u Like's muziek video on Vevo door the time spring ends. That way, Give It What u Like will attract her US fans better than what Hello Kitty did since Hello Kitty only appeals Japanese tastes. Anyway, if Give It What u Like needs to be number 1, then Hello Kitty can. Hello Kitty needs to be number 1 on the dance Billboard chart. I don't care if people hated Hello Kitty and stick with Let Go/Under My Skin. Hello Kitty needs to be number 1 on any Billboard chart. So if that's the case, Hello Kitty and Give It What u Like needs to be number 1 hits on any Billboard charts. Hello Kitty needs to peak at number 1 on US Hot Dance Songs chart and Give It What u Like needs to peak at number 1 on Hot AC chart. Let Me Go doesn't save her muziek industry last jaar thanks to mixed reviews and bad marketing for killing Let Me Go. Not the song itself.
Another problem is that people hated Hello Kitty. I mean, why Hello Kitty was outraged door people? Why people hate Avril Lavigne's Hello Kitty? Why people miss the Let Go/Under My Skin era? First of all, there's no such thing as I miss the Let Go/Under My Skin era. To me, Let Go is fine, but Under My Skin feels meer like a post 2002 Avril Lavigne album than a sophomore album. In my opinion, there are far better sophomore albums like Taylor Swift's Fearless than Under My Skin. Compared to other sophomore albums like Spice World, of even her 2002 debut album Let Go, Under My Skin is far weaker. Plus, Under My Skin has a built in RCA to scare off Avril Lavigne's muziek listeners and prevent the Under My Skin era to have a Grammy nomination in 2005 at the 2005 Grammys. So if u think u miss Under My Skin from 10 years ago, then I hope you're happy. So here's what happens, after Arista finished making Under My Skin 10 years ago, RCA came in and distribute Under My Skin. RCA cut the best Avril Lavigne album that fans and critics praised in 2004 door turning in Under My Skin's serious bratty songs into quick cash-in ballads causing Under My Skin to be difficult to be shown in the muziek public in 2004 along with poor singles selections and explicit writing. Overall, Under My Skin turned out to be a mess. The only Under My Skin bratty song is He Wasn't and only 3 singles (Don't Tell Me, My Happy Ending and Nobody's Home) released in the US and not He Wasn't. 2004 muziek don't care about Under My Skin. Avril Lavigne doesn't perform My Happy Ending at the 2004 MTV VMA despite Don't Tell Me has a nomination. Worse, no Grammy nominations for Under My Skin in 2005. This is why RCA is a bad label for Under My Skin. Arista should market Under My Skin because it was made door the same label who made Let Go. But no, RCA held Under My Skin Back. Overall, Under My Skin era is a complete mess. That's why other 2004 muziek like Kelly Clarkson's Since U Been Gone as well as the Let Go era is better than Under My Skin. That's why 2004 is a weak jaar for Avril Lavigne
Under My Skin was lucky however. It become her first number 1 album in 2004 unlike Let Go selling nearly 10 million copies worldwide making it her seconde best selling album of all time. My Happy Ending is her number 1 single of 2004 becoming her third most played song on the radio. But the way Under My Skin was marketed is not what RCA marketed from 10 years ago. Overall, there are far better albums including her own Let Go album than Under My Skin along with The Best Damn Thing and Goodbye Lullaby. OK, Under My Skin is done. Let's get back to Hello Kitty. Shall we? Anyway, as u may know that Hello Kitty has gained over 25 million aantal keer bekeken on YouTube and Vevo which is pretty good for an Avril Lavigne muziek video. Let's hope Hello Kitty was sent to US dance radio stations so it can peak at number at on the US Hot Dance Songs chart this year. Avril Lavigne needs a 2010s number 1 single and Hello Kitty is perfect for peaking at number 1 on any Billboard chart. Oh yeah, one meer thing, it's OK for u to not enjoy Hello Kitty. But people bashing Hello Kitty is not gonna make Hello Kitty populair on the radio. So just ignore Hello Kitty so u can prefer Let Go of the miguided album Under My Skin from the 2004-2011 era and you'll be fine. Is that easy? OK, let's talk about why Hello Kitty is taking a risk but end up doing well this year.
So as u may know that Hello Kitty is similar to the post 2002 Avril Lavigne songs of the 2004-2011 era, but it most likely won't be plagued with the problems that plagued them. Those songs were produced when RCA executives had their way. Read up on all the horror stories. An Avril Lavigne song called He Wasn't from her sophmore album, Under My Skin, was being cut from Under My Skin's singles selection in 2005 because the muziek department at test screenings got antsy for not releasing He Wasn't's muziek video on MTV in 2005, the decision to throw RCA and explicit writing into My Happy Ending in 2004 causing that 2004 song to get rejected door the radio in 2004 after it peaked at number 1 on top, boven 40 Mainstream and played meer than 80 million times on the radio causing that Avril Lavigne song to unable to compete against other 2004 songs like Since U Been Gong, RCA killed Arista's Under My Skin (Avril Lavigne's seconde album from 2004) causing that album to pale along with its singles like Don't Tell Me compared to 2002's Let Go era despite selling almost 3 million copies in the US and fans loved the album, the various cuts done to her third album, The Best Damn Thing like no Keep Holding On muziek video, fans hated Girlfriend in 2007 despite Girlfriend peaked at number 1 on Billboard Hot 100 in 2007 and the butchering of Goodbye Lullaby (Avril Lavigne's 4th album in 2011)... The lijst goes on. Now that the RCA era is over, Epic Records and LA Reid don't have to worry about this. No meer pandering Avril Lavigne songs to people who doesn't care about Avril Lavigne, no attempts to make an Avril Lavigne song meer appealing to muziek listeners who never heard of Avril Lavigne rather than fans. Avril Lavigne is following footsteps of another artist like Madonna and Taylor Swift, allowing Avril Lavigne to create great songs for all ages without having to pander to any particular audience.
This is why Avril Lavigne's recent outputs is superior to a majority of her muziek released between 2004 and 2011. I'll take Here's To Never Growing Up, Rock N Roll, Let Me Go and Hello Kitty over Don't Tell Me, My Happy Ending, Nobody's Home, Girlfriend, When You're Gone, Hot, The Best Damn Thing, What The Hell, Smile and Wish u Were Here any day. So let's get back to Hello Kitty. Shall we? Now, if u think u hate Hello Kitty, then go ahead and bash Hello Kitty all u want. But Avril Lavigne worked so hard on her Hello Kitty muziek video because the muziek video takes place in Japan. Avril Lavigne loves Japan. So that's why Japan is a perfect country for Avril Lavigne. But cheer up u guys. She will be releasing her Give It What u Like muziek video to Vevo towards the end of spring just in time for summer while Hello Kitty can make a great filler for an Avril Lavigne single. So let's hope Hello Kitty and Give It What u Like would be perfect Avril Lavigne songs for US radio stations. Hello Kitty better peak at number 1 on the US Billboard charts. Any US Billboard chart will do the trick this year. Dance Songs chart might be better though
OK, I hope u like my commentaren about why Avril Lavigne needs her number 2010's singles this year.
I think that Avril Lavigne needs a 2010s number 1 single really badly. 2010s was a difficult decade for Avril Lavigne for not having any 2010s number 1s at all. RCA killed 2011's Goodbye Lullaby era and Epic Records killed Avril Lavigne's 2013 outputs like Let Me Go. Avril Lavigne should've done a better job if Arista Records is still around. Arista is much better label for Avril than RCA of Epic. RCA and Epic ruined Avril Lavigne's materials after 2002. Let's take a look.
For instance, Avril Lavigne's Max Martin song, What The Hell, should be a perfect Avril Lavigne song to have a comeback. Right? Nope. What The Hell released in 2011. But I think 2011 is a terrible datum for What The Hell. 2010 is a much better datum for that song. The same applies to Smile, Wish u Were Here, and her fourth album, Goodbye Lullaby. What The Hell should peak at number 1. But no, that song did not peaked at number 1. Why? RCA and terrible marketing. RCA made Avril Lavigne had trouble having her songs peaked at number 1 on any Billboard chart. What is RCA thinking? Whatever happened to Let Go and Artista? Now it's just RCA and modern crap. I'm sick of today's outputs and RCA. The only way is inventions. Let's continue.
u know Avril Lavigne's 2004 sophmore album Under My Skin released 10 years ago. Right? Well, not really. RCA killed Arista's Under My Skin in 2004 and her discography started to get really bad when her sophomore album, which is Under My Skin, was released in 2004. I know fans loved the 2004 album. But I think that 2004 is where muziek started to treat Avril Lavigne the wrong way even on her post Let Go ballads of her hit sophomore album, Under My Skin. RCA is a nightmare for Avril Lavigne in the 2004/2007/2011 era. Even after the RCA is over, Epic Records ruined her 2013 comeback outputs like Here's To Never Growing Up door putting in bad marketing explicit writing and Martin Johnson. The modern era acted the same way the RCA did back in 2004-2011. What is American muziek industry thinking?
So what we need to get Avril Lavigne's number 1 America sucesses back is to release a Give It What u Like single on the radio later this maand of volgende maand and have Give It What u Like peak at number 1 on US ITunes in the US Digital Songs chart door selling let's say 400k-500k digital copies and have it stayed for like 2-3 weeks tying in the premiere of Give It What u Like's muziek video on Vevo door the time spring ends. That way, Give It What u Like will attract her US fans better than what Hello Kitty did since Hello Kitty only appeals Japanese tastes. Anyway, if Give It What u Like needs to be number 1, then Hello Kitty can. Hello Kitty needs to be number 1 on the dance Billboard chart. I don't care if people hated Hello Kitty and stick with Let Go/Under My Skin. Hello Kitty needs to be number 1 on any Billboard chart. So if that's the case, Hello Kitty and Give It What u Like needs to be number 1 hits on any Billboard charts. Hello Kitty needs to peak at number 1 on US Hot Dance Songs chart and Give It What u Like needs to peak at number 1 on Hot AC chart. Let Me Go doesn't save her muziek industry last jaar thanks to mixed reviews and bad marketing for killing Let Me Go. Not the song itself.
Another problem is that people hated Hello Kitty. I mean, why Hello Kitty was outraged door people? Why people hate Avril Lavigne's Hello Kitty? Why people miss the Let Go/Under My Skin era? First of all, there's no such thing as I miss the Let Go/Under My Skin era. To me, Let Go is fine, but Under My Skin feels meer like a post 2002 Avril Lavigne album than a sophomore album. In my opinion, there are far better sophomore albums like Taylor Swift's Fearless than Under My Skin. Compared to other sophomore albums like Spice World, of even her 2002 debut album Let Go, Under My Skin is far weaker. Plus, Under My Skin has a built in RCA to scare off Avril Lavigne's muziek listeners and prevent the Under My Skin era to have a Grammy nomination in 2005 at the 2005 Grammys. So if u think u miss Under My Skin from 10 years ago, then I hope you're happy. So here's what happens, after Arista finished making Under My Skin 10 years ago, RCA came in and distribute Under My Skin. RCA cut the best Avril Lavigne album that fans and critics praised in 2004 door turning in Under My Skin's serious bratty songs into quick cash-in ballads causing Under My Skin to be difficult to be shown in the muziek public in 2004 along with poor singles selections and explicit writing. Overall, Under My Skin turned out to be a mess. The only Under My Skin bratty song is He Wasn't and only 3 singles (Don't Tell Me, My Happy Ending and Nobody's Home) released in the US and not He Wasn't. 2004 muziek don't care about Under My Skin. Avril Lavigne doesn't perform My Happy Ending at the 2004 MTV VMA despite Don't Tell Me has a nomination. Worse, no Grammy nominations for Under My Skin in 2005. This is why RCA is a bad label for Under My Skin. Arista should market Under My Skin because it was made door the same label who made Let Go. But no, RCA held Under My Skin Back. Overall, Under My Skin era is a complete mess. That's why other 2004 muziek like Kelly Clarkson's Since U Been Gone as well as the Let Go era is better than Under My Skin. That's why 2004 is a weak jaar for Avril Lavigne
Under My Skin was lucky however. It become her first number 1 album in 2004 unlike Let Go selling nearly 10 million copies worldwide making it her seconde best selling album of all time. My Happy Ending is her number 1 single of 2004 becoming her third most played song on the radio. But the way Under My Skin was marketed is not what RCA marketed from 10 years ago. Overall, there are far better albums including her own Let Go album than Under My Skin along with The Best Damn Thing and Goodbye Lullaby. OK, Under My Skin is done. Let's get back to Hello Kitty. Shall we? Anyway, as u may know that Hello Kitty has gained over 25 million aantal keer bekeken on YouTube and Vevo which is pretty good for an Avril Lavigne muziek video. Let's hope Hello Kitty was sent to US dance radio stations so it can peak at number at on the US Hot Dance Songs chart this year. Avril Lavigne needs a 2010s number 1 single and Hello Kitty is perfect for peaking at number 1 on any Billboard chart. Oh yeah, one meer thing, it's OK for u to not enjoy Hello Kitty. But people bashing Hello Kitty is not gonna make Hello Kitty populair on the radio. So just ignore Hello Kitty so u can prefer Let Go of the miguided album Under My Skin from the 2004-2011 era and you'll be fine. Is that easy? OK, let's talk about why Hello Kitty is taking a risk but end up doing well this year.
So as u may know that Hello Kitty is similar to the post 2002 Avril Lavigne songs of the 2004-2011 era, but it most likely won't be plagued with the problems that plagued them. Those songs were produced when RCA executives had their way. Read up on all the horror stories. An Avril Lavigne song called He Wasn't from her sophmore album, Under My Skin, was being cut from Under My Skin's singles selection in 2005 because the muziek department at test screenings got antsy for not releasing He Wasn't's muziek video on MTV in 2005, the decision to throw RCA and explicit writing into My Happy Ending in 2004 causing that 2004 song to get rejected door the radio in 2004 after it peaked at number 1 on top, boven 40 Mainstream and played meer than 80 million times on the radio causing that Avril Lavigne song to unable to compete against other 2004 songs like Since U Been Gong, RCA killed Arista's Under My Skin (Avril Lavigne's seconde album from 2004) causing that album to pale along with its singles like Don't Tell Me compared to 2002's Let Go era despite selling almost 3 million copies in the US and fans loved the album, the various cuts done to her third album, The Best Damn Thing like no Keep Holding On muziek video, fans hated Girlfriend in 2007 despite Girlfriend peaked at number 1 on Billboard Hot 100 in 2007 and the butchering of Goodbye Lullaby (Avril Lavigne's 4th album in 2011)... The lijst goes on. Now that the RCA era is over, Epic Records and LA Reid don't have to worry about this. No meer pandering Avril Lavigne songs to people who doesn't care about Avril Lavigne, no attempts to make an Avril Lavigne song meer appealing to muziek listeners who never heard of Avril Lavigne rather than fans. Avril Lavigne is following footsteps of another artist like Madonna and Taylor Swift, allowing Avril Lavigne to create great songs for all ages without having to pander to any particular audience.
This is why Avril Lavigne's recent outputs is superior to a majority of her muziek released between 2004 and 2011. I'll take Here's To Never Growing Up, Rock N Roll, Let Me Go and Hello Kitty over Don't Tell Me, My Happy Ending, Nobody's Home, Girlfriend, When You're Gone, Hot, The Best Damn Thing, What The Hell, Smile and Wish u Were Here any day. So let's get back to Hello Kitty. Shall we? Now, if u think u hate Hello Kitty, then go ahead and bash Hello Kitty all u want. But Avril Lavigne worked so hard on her Hello Kitty muziek video because the muziek video takes place in Japan. Avril Lavigne loves Japan. So that's why Japan is a perfect country for Avril Lavigne. But cheer up u guys. She will be releasing her Give It What u Like muziek video to Vevo towards the end of spring just in time for summer while Hello Kitty can make a great filler for an Avril Lavigne single. So let's hope Hello Kitty and Give It What u Like would be perfect Avril Lavigne songs for US radio stations. Hello Kitty better peak at number 1 on the US Billboard charts. Any US Billboard chart will do the trick this year. Dance Songs chart might be better though
OK, I hope u like my commentaren about why Avril Lavigne needs her number 2010's singles this year.