beantwoord deze vraag

Harry Potter Vs. Twilight Vraag

Why did they make Breaking Dawn into 2 films ? What's the point ?

If the Deathly Hallows made into 2 movies, I understand. Since there are a lot of important information of scenes that can't be cut.

But, breaking dawn? are u kidding ?
there's no important information of anything in that book. Nearly half of the book is Edward and Bella's honeymoon.

So, help me, give a good reason why Breaking Dawn should be made to Part 1 and Part 2? Because I really can't understand.
THANK u =)
 ReibyKathBlack posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Harry Potter Vs. Twilight  het beste antwoord

cassie-1-2-3 said:
While it's not exactly action packed, it is long. A lot does happen. There are two seperate plot lines in the book. The wedding/honeymoon/birth, then there's the raising of Renesmee/Volturi threat/training with all the vampires/confronting the Volturi. (I don't know how it will be divided up. That's only a guess)
If all that was squeezed into a typical 2-hour movie, it would only allow roughly 15 minuten on each topic. It deserves meer than that, no matter how much certain people dislike it.

There are plenty of long films without nonstop action.

select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Yes, a lot. In addition to what I said, there's all that happened with Jacob. Him running away, leaving the pack, forming his own separate pack. My math was off at first, sorry, but now, it would be at 10 minuten to spend on each point.
cassie-1-2-3 posted een jaar geleden
*
righty there
youknowit101 posted een jaar geleden
*
Here
cassie-1-2-3 posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Antwoorden

GemonkDruid said:
They wanted to copy Harry Potter, of course.

What? It is a good reason. Lots of people want to copy HP. Percy Jackson did (yeah, HP fans, I admit it; but I still love PJO more!). The Magician's Daughter did. I did... sort of. Well, I subconsciously copied Harry's look.

While it's completely understandable to want to be like one of the greatest book/movie phenomenons ever, there's this little thing called plagerism. That's why Bella doesn't have red hair and Edward doesn't have glasses and a scar. So they did the volgende best thing: copy the franchise style.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
yeah, when I heard about this BD thing i'm like WTF ?! oh well ....
ReibyKathBlack posted een jaar geleden
*
Wenever zei it was, but if your beiigest competitor is splitting a movie into two, you're AL LOT meer likely realise just how much profitable it would be. Especially when they saw how well it went down with the fans :) x
Italktosnakes posted een jaar geleden
*
*We never *biggest *A
Italktosnakes posted een jaar geleden
zanhar1 said:
I alaways thought it was to make meer money.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
lakota_spirit said:
Two films= Twice the money.......... its all about the money!
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Italktosnakes said:
I think that there's quite a lot of stuff going on, that may have needed it to be a bit longer than normal two-hour movies- even if a lot of stuff is absolute crap (as is some people's opinion).
But I also think that the fact that DH is spleet, split made them realise just how good splitting it is. Obviously there gonna get at least twice as much money from this, and that's just ticket sales. Proper fans will get posters from both parts and other merch. Money wise- it's an obvious verplaats really. :D x
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
IzzyOzera said:
Because Stephanie Meyer wrote a book full of crap (at least in my opinion)and then the people making the movie though they should keep all the same crap in the movie then realised it was too long and thought um what should we do, then heard DH was going to be two films and went "I know we'll make two movies"
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
bri-marie said:
They actually kind of did have a lot of information in Breaking Dawn. There was the wedding and honey moon and Bella finding out she was pregnant (it is still a romance so they aren't going to cut those parts out/down), there's the thing with Jacobs wolf-pack, the explanation (however half-assed it was) about Nessie, Irina finding out about her and running to the Volturi, there's the whole explanation about the Immortal Children, Alice and Jasper running off, the gathering (and practicing) of the other clans, and the "showdown" at the end. It's too much stuff to put into one two-hour long movie.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Sasume said:
There is no answer. There is no understanding. Twilight is crap (in my opinion) and they decided it would make it better to copy HP's style...I doubt I'm wasting money to watch two halves of crap...
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Ms_Mea said:
I have a simple answer for you:
MONEY!

Think about it; Twilight is HUGE these days, so a lot of fangirls/guys are going to want to see BD and will pay a lot of money to see it...
Then HP announced that they're splitting DH into two parts.
Now, I'm sure u all know that HP is also a big thing, therefore they are also making a lot of money from their films as well...
So then some "genius" on the Twilight set thought, "Hey! Let's make two films and get LOADS of money just like HP!" (the HP bit may of may not have been included the their thought process...depends on the intelligence and how anti-plagerism this genius is)
Therefore BD: Pt. 1&2 is born
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
RandomRebekah said:
Yeah, what is the point?
I bought breaking dawn and i dont know how anyone could read the whole book of even like it!
its c***.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
sehrish-cullen said:
i think it the last part of the series...so definitely it contains a lot of stuff about other vampire too...like kate and her mother...there are lot of characters and each character has its liltle story in it...plus the honey moon was just fine not too long
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
ecpjll said:
It's called drawing it out to make meer money. duh. They did it with Harry Potter too. Now people have to pay to see 2 meer films as opposed to 1.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
next question »