beantwoord deze vraag

Harry Potter Vs. Twilight Vraag

what is this all about but everybody knows edward will win because hes hotter koeler, koelwagen and has bella

*
Ahem, even Robert Pattison says he hates Edward Cullen and zei he played him as a "manic - depressive"
Mrs-Grint posted een jaar geleden
*
Well, he got it right then, I think Edward and Bella are meer than depressive. They Probably have all the $hit I have. Im diagnosed with Bipoloar, anxiety and Depression. That makes u act down and pathetic. But hallo even I have meer brand under my butt than those two.
Flounder13 posted een jaar geleden
*
wow, sucks for him, he has bella.
FredWRules posted een jaar geleden
 ali269 posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Harry Potter Vs. Twilight  het beste antwoord

xxharrypotterxx said:
WOW. God forbid someone who doesn't like Twilight. JK Rowling is a MUCH better writer with original ideas, unlike Myers. How many "vampire love stories" have u seen in this world? MILLIONS. So lets see, how many boeken have had a young boy who lost his parents and discovers hes a wizard were there before Harry Potter? NONE. And which series took about 4 years to FINALLY get popular? Twilight, unlike Harry Potter, which was an instant hit. Plus, Robert Pattison is NOT a good actor, of hotter. Daniel Radcliffe is the best door far in any science-fiction/fantasy films of boeken and is WAY meer handsome. Harry Potter is funny, action filled, romantic, and a page turner. So my vote in this "fight" would DEFINATELY go to Harry Potter.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
I totally agree. Daniel Radcliffe is a MUCH better actor AND Tom Felton.
Mrs-Grint posted een jaar geleden
*
I think almost all of the HP actors are amazing.
LadyLilith posted een jaar geleden
*
AGREED! I have NO idea why they chose the actors of twilight...I mean some of them are good like alice and jasper, esme, carlisle, emmett, rosalie, ect. but Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson? COME ON! They suck at acting and they are sooooo ugly!
franny_potter posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Antwoorden

burgundyeyes said:
The fact that Edward is hotter and koeler, koelwagen doesn't mean he's a better character of has meer depth to him. it's outside beauty. And as for the part that he has bella, well, i sort of pity him. how he can stand such an annoying whimpy girl, i will never know.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
I agree with u when u say how can he stand Bella? because she is so annoying!
TEAM-EDWARDxxx posted een jaar geleden
*
Edward has weird eyebrows. :P
Mrs-Grint posted een jaar geleden
*
I rekon Kristen stewart looks stoned sometimes..In twilight she didnt know how to act! But she is getting better
TEAM-EDWARDxxx posted een jaar geleden
TEAM-EDWARDxxx said:
Everyone had their oppionion and obviously that's yours.I love Edward and Twilight for that matter, he has some really good points, but some bad ones also,but so does Harry Potter.
And i know that u are expressing your oppioion on here , but i think some people might take it the wrong way, like some people have already done.
But some people on here just need to take a chill pill lol, shes just saying what she thinks and if u dont like it then dont diss her about it.
I think that Edward is better then Harry potter, and that Robert Pattinson is better then Daniel Radcliffe. But then again thats just what i think.
Robert is a good actor,singer and model!
And who cares if Twilight took 4 years to become popular,it finally did didnt it? and there are alot of GREAT boeken out there that havnt become popular. Twilight is a Action,Romance,Comedy and a mystery book <- Now this book is a real page turner.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
great answer!
Hellohoudini posted een jaar geleden
*
There's no action of comedy, lust and obsession don't count as romance and the 'epic mystery' of Edward being a vampire was solved in the blurb.
ToyletGnome posted een jaar geleden
*
if action is just moving, then shouldn't everything in the world, even a documentary be classified as "action"?
FredWRules posted een jaar geleden
PMT said:
What it's 'all about' is not a debate about who is 'hotter' of 'cooler'. It' a debate about which book is better - about how deep the plot is, how captivating, well-written etc. And having a hot and cool character certainly doesn't affect that. Being a good book does not depend upon how cool the main characters are and that's why the debate about the better book has never been about Edward vs Harry. And I'd be scared for the future of literature if it was.
Really, u need to grow up.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
And I don't mean characters have nothing to do with how good the book is, because they do. But not in this way. Not in how powerful, hot of cool they are. It's meer about their development and richness. That is, one dimensional characters are not very rich of have much depth..
PMT posted een jaar geleden
*
Yeah i agree. It isnt about whose 'hotter of 'cooler', but obviously this person thinks it is.
TEAM-EDWARDxxx posted een jaar geleden
*
omg I know!! Twilight is not the new Harry Potter so just.. stop
1-2vampire posted een jaar geleden
LadyLilith said:
So that's ultimately all that matters? How 'hot' and 'cool' the character is? God, that doesn't seem immature and shallow in the slightest. WHO GIVES A DAMN IF HE'S HOT? Is that really all u freaking care about? u need to grow up and get a life. Edward in my opinion is actually not hot; he's a one dimensional stalkerish abusive vampire. There's nothing special about him. He is a completely flat character. He is so BORING. I'd like to see your big bad sparklepyre go up against Voldemort; he would get all angsty on the Dark Lord's ezel and he would get annoyed and Avada Kedavra him. Dead as a doornail in 1 minute. Just like he should be. And as someone else mentioned, I feel sorry for this character because he has Bella. Oh wait, I don't. Because he's a flat boring character. So who cares?

And there's my losing my temper for the day. *Throws in towel* And keep in mind this was directed at the maker of this so called "question," no one else. I apologized if I offended anyone else.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Thats okay, if I see another Twilight thing Im going to blow up too, It wont be pretty. u ALL HAVE BEEN FOREWARNED
Flounder13 posted een jaar geleden
*
Hear, hear!
Mrs-Grint posted een jaar geleden
XDRoseLuvsHP said:
How will being hotter than Harry help him win anything? What will Edward do? Sparkle at him? At least Harry Potter doesn't have the message, "If u are pretty, u are amazing. If u are ugly, u are a shame to society." Harry is lovable without being the hottest guy in the world, which is meer than I can say for Twilight. Nobody would like Edward if he weren't so damn gorgeous. He's a creepy and abusive stalker who has no life.

How is Edward koeler, koelwagen than Harry in any way? As I zei earlier, he is creepy, abusive and stalkerish, none of which are cool at all. Having no life isn't cool either. Just because he's pretty doesn't make him cool. Harry is cool because he treats people right (he never abuses Ginny of any of his friends, unlike Edward) and he has a life. Besides saving the world, he's a ster Quidditch player. I'd say that is pretty cool.

Having Bella actually harms Edward. What is the Mary-Sue, whiny and selfish, arrogant and rude, good for nothing Bella going to do to help anything? All she ever does is ungratefully complain about her life, talk about how pretty her boyfriend is, and hide behind her man while he saves the day. Anti-feminism! Ginny may not be my favoriete character in Harry Potter, but she is a heck of a lot better than Bella! At least Ginny can fight for herself. Both characters are sluts (well, in boeken 5-6 for Ginny) but at least JK Rowling did it purposely. Ginny also actually has a personality and a life. She sticks up for her vrienden as opposed to abusing them.

If u are talking about winning in a fight, I would firstly like to point out that Bella would lose in a fight against Pigwidgeon. Ginny, however, can actually fight just as efficiently as a male in Harry Potter can. Secondly, Edward wouldn't stand a chance against Harry. Just one wave of the wand, and Edward is done.

Harry >>>>> edward (his name does not deserve capitalization)
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
lol! Agree with this... Ginny was actually duelling BELLATRIX!!! One of the most skilled and dangerous Death Eaters!
MissDK posted een jaar geleden
*
haha loving the capitalization :)
1-2vampire posted een jaar geleden
1-2vampire said:
i no i lyk so agree. i @m $0 jealusz ov edwerd. i wIsH i ad a stalker-loving clutzy miserable boring drip door my side...

YEAH RIGHT!

seriously, what is the point in this question? Edward is not "cool" he is tortured he is not "hot" he even LOOKS like he's being tortured. YEah, he has Bella, but if that's sooo amazing to have then why the hell is he always going around looking strained?

Listen, Harry Potter's characters actually HAVE characters. They are not all "pretty" and "graceful" which, in my opinion, is realistic.
Harry Potter HAS a VERY GOOOD plot, something Stephanie Meyer's Twilight "saga" lacks.

If another vraag like this pops up I will SLAUGHTER TWILIGHT.

P.S -- Bram Stoker haunted me last night. He was there door my bookcase, he took up New Moon, and then ripped it up, tearing it apart with his teeth. This left no mess, but New Moon was not in my bookcase, when I saw this I shouted to the door where he disappeared "CAN u COME AND DO THE REST?!"
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
hoo da heel is bram stoker??
iluvtwilight_ posted een jaar geleden
*
^ Bram Stoker is the auteur of Dracula, y'know, a vampire novel which is actually about vampires.
ToyletGnome posted een jaar geleden
*
lol someons respondin to the twihard talk
luv_warriorcatz posted een jaar geleden
Metal_chick1749 said:
sorry to break it you, but not everyone loves edward. in fact i HATE him. and not just becuz he's apart of twilight, but becuz he's an idiot.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
YOUR SO RIGHT I HATE HIM STAKE HIM DAMMIT
vampiressJazz posted een jaar geleden
*
LOL! Very, passionate.
Mrs-Grint posted een jaar geleden
*
Alright, who's got the hyperdiamond stake? *grins* ('cause since Edward is almost of the same hardness as diamond, we need an object demonstrably harder than diamond for it to work).
Aquilia posted een jaar geleden
Kylie90210 said:
Seriously? My brain hurts from trying to figure out what you're trying to say...
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Flounder13 said:
Let me sum it up for u in my own little way = I dont give a good God damn about Twilight of anything that deals with it. Thanks. Oh and along with what Lady Lilith said, Lord Voldy would kick Eddys arse so hard, while Bellatrix could kill Bella in a staring contest shes so whimpy.
select as best answer
 Let me sum it up for u in my own little way = I dont give a good God damn about Twilight of anything that deals with it. Thanks. Oh and along with what Lady Lilith said, Lord Voldy would kick Eddys arse so hard, while Bellatrix could kill Bella in a staring contest shes so whimpy.
posted een jaar geleden 
*
God would I love to see this showdown in real life. Bellatrix would just glance at Bella in her evil way, and Bella would run screaming to the corpse that is now Edward. And while we're at it, let's have the Death Eaters and the Volturi fight each other! SM talks like they're all big and bad in her books, but she never actually gives any examples/reasons. Just the title. 'They're the bad guys, they're evil.' Suuure. The Death Eaters would wipe the floor with them in no time then go out somewhere for lunch. GO LUCIUS!!!
LadyLilith posted een jaar geleden
*
Sure, Sounds good to me! Dont know if your a ster Wars fan but Vader and the Storm Troopers will gladely help too. LOL. They are a disgrace to all things called a fanbase and/or saga.
Flounder13 posted een jaar geleden
*
Bellatrix alone would "Crucio" Jane so hard she'll scream, then suddenly the Evil Faries would charge, then the Death Eaters, (while eating their lunch) would flick their wands and all of the Volturi would be dead. I swear in Breaking Dawn I bet u ANY MONEY there will be really dramatic muziek in the battle scene, and then its over and people would be like "is that it?". SOME BATTLE SCENE! it was meer like a debate in the book (i mean THIS debate is meer of a battle scene than the one in Breaking Dawn!)
1-2vampire posted een jaar geleden
dobbyssocks said:
I think that edward is very creppy and stalkerish. Am i the only person who finds it weird that edward watches bella sleep and she is ok with that? And to any person who thinks hp doesnt have love, the whole book is about love. its just not throw at you. its meer realistic. and having bella isnt a plus.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Have u thought about joining CAT? Lots of people there who share your opinion of Edward.
November99 posted een jaar geleden
*
I agree. Watching u sleep is not romantic. If Bella were normal, she would have thrown a brick at him. I don't know where she got it.
LilysLittleTwin posted een jaar geleden
*
OK im sorry but 1st of all: u dont watch someone sleep and 2nd: u dont follow someone around incase they need ur help!...
franny_potter posted een jaar geleden
GemonkDruid said:
Ahahaha... oh, wait, you're serious.

I'm assuming that 'this' would be this spot: The Harry Potter vs. Twilight spot. Simple. This is a place to discuss which book is better in a calm, civil way. Personally, I like HP better, but I'm still willing to hear some Twilight fans out.

And, ahem... hotter, cooler? u just contradicted yourself there.

And I don't see how having Bella is a good thing. She's a whiny, angsty, Mary-Sue, and if I even touched her, I would take a decontamination douche before grating my skin off.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
AprilCandy42 said:
*facepalm* Hotter? Cooler? Will win? No, he is (in my opinion) retarded, gay and failure. Yeah, he has Bella, but she just seems very stupid, not very useless, but stupid and whiny. I zei my opinion, no need to go bashing, but if u want to, go ahead. Just don't expect a good result after your bashing and insults...
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Aquilia said:
link

This is a prime example of the fallacy Ad nauseam and therefore it may be discredited from the main HP vs TW debate.

Sorry, I've had enough of this sort of argumentation. HP fans, we have already discredited this so many times it's getting whiny. I suggest blank ignorance volgende time this sort of vraag shows up.

To point out another fallacy: Just because Edward is hotter Does not automatically infer the conclusion that he is going to win. This is called Non Sequitur - The conclusion does not follow from the statements, therefore it's an invalid argument.

Question: How many logical fallacies can a rabid Twilight fan squeeze into an argument?
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Huh, good question. Well, there's only one way to find out: *drumroll* TWILIGHT FANGIRL BINGO!
ToyletGnome posted een jaar geleden
*
^ LOL
Aquilia posted een jaar geleden
woofbark said:
"One should not be judged door the color of their skin but door the content of their character."
-Martin Luther King Jr.

Edward's skin color? Sparkly pale, like glitter glue. But does that matter? Let's stop and pause for one second. Bella mentions how beautiful Edward is in his looks and movement ONE HUNDRED SIXTY SEVEN TIMES in TWILIGHT ALONE. We never hear how Edward is compassionate and gentle. Why not?........it doesn't matter, since apparently, beauty is all that matters.
Bella would never have noticed Edward if he wasn't so "beautiful." If he had looked (in the book) any worse that a model, she would have thought of him as another person she could manipulate and use. A typical "love" scene in Twilight has Bella complimenting Edward on his Adonis-ish-ness, Edward saying some thesaurus-researched word that he never would have zei even if he WAS a real 1920s vampire, a paragraph about his scintillating skin. Bella remarks about her stupidity and/or falls over.

Love scene in HP: Unless lust scene with Ron and Lavender, the characters talk about the peril of their mission and how they probably won't survive. One character is zei to have a flaw in their looks (eg.Ginny looked weary and worn) and they tell each other they'll "hold on to the end" of something like that. Cue inspirational quote and/or "I can't be with you,"or one complimenting another on a difficult task they overcame.

No mentions of Harry's "Topaz eyes" of Ron's "Scintillating arms."

In Harry Potter, beauty isn't everything. u may disagree and think that beauty is the most important thing one can possess, but when you're stuck in a room slowly filling with boiling water u can't smile your way out of it, u need intelligence and resourcefulness. Beauty is not a bad trait, but a character needs meer than "sparkling skin" to be a character with depth.


So, we've established that "hotness" does not matter.



Edward's cool?
Let's think, what powers does Edward possess that might make him "cool":

1.Super speed
2.Mind reading
3.Super Strength
4.Sparkles in sun
5."Hotness" which doesn't count, see above
6.He's dead so his body is cold, which means cool
7.Immortality

Now, let's see if Harry can match that:
Super Speed: Harry can apparate, disappear in one place and reappear in another
Mind reading:Legilemency
Super Strength:Diffindo spell rips heavy objects apart. Wingardium Leviosa makes heavy objects fly. Accio makes heavy objects go to you.
Sparkles:Body glitter, and there has to be some sparkling spell too
Literally cold: Freezing charm/potion
Immortality:unicorn blood, philosophers/Sorcerer's Stone





































He has Bella? Poor Edward. 'Tis a fate worse than death.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
next question »