beantwoord deze vraag

Harry Potter Vraag

Do u feel like Breaking Dawn being made in to 2 parts is copying Deathly Hallows?

Personally, I feel like it is copying. I still doubt that Twilight will make as much money as DH did. What do u feel?
 TwinsTwin posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Harry Potter  het beste antwoord

KateKicksAss said:
No.

u act as though the Harry Potter company owns the very idea of splitting a book to movie thing into two pieces.

Besides, it's basically the equivalent of just doing a movie series, like with sequels.

To be honest, it makes perfect sense. I mean, even if the studios ARE just doing it for meer money, both BD and DH ARE big boeken with a lot of things going on in them. It's just logical to spleet, split them in two, and I for one am grateful at least that they spleet, split DH, because it probably would have been a disaster if they'd tried to cram it all into one film.

But seriously, u act like two studios using a similar idea is copying.

door a stretch, that would mean that Harry Potter copied every other movie series, oh my god, they made Harry Potter sequels! Warner Bros is copying every other film series out there!
And Robert Pattinson was in Harry Potter AND Twilight! Ergo Twilight copied the idea of using Robert Pattinson!

Seriously. Claiming it's copying is just ridiculous.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
next question »

Antwoorden

Mongoose09 said:
Yes. I know Harry Potter isn't the first movie to do things in parts but I highly doubt that Breaking Dawn would be in 2 parts if Deathly Hallows wasn't.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
best awnser
lunaginny posted een jaar geleden
*
I agree with u
lilcherrywine posted een jaar geleden
*
i agree tooooo awsome girl!
desybloodlove1 posted een jaar geleden
ChocoLuvr101 said:
No.
A book being spleet, split into two parts dosen't originally belong to Harry Potter. It never did.
Breaking Dawn is thickest book among all four and has a lot of things going on. So the result would be really bad if they just cram it all into one movie. So I don't really have a problem with it being it spleet, split into 2 like DH.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
awsome!
desybloodlove1 posted een jaar geleden
bri-marie said:
I feel that Deathly Hallows copied Kill Bill, and It.

So, technically, DH and BD are copying other movies.

The right to spleet, split a movie into parts is not -- nor will it ever be -- owned door a single franchise. Breaking Dawn needs to be spleet, split in two, just as Deathly Hallows did.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
What's "Kill Bill?"
TwinsTwin posted een jaar geleden
*
A movie. So is It.
bri-marie posted een jaar geleden
*
^I don't care.
bri-marie posted een jaar geleden
erlina41 said:
Yes and that makes me hate Twilight even meer -.-
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
i agree too ¬¬
sephyma-jones posted een jaar geleden
*
-.- omg ur stupied twightlit awsom u freakin retard!
desybloodlove1 posted een jaar geleden
*
@desybloodlove1 learn how to speak english and then tell about "twilightit"...
erlina41 posted een jaar geleden
*
No need to be nasty. They are two FICTIONAL books. Get over it.
MGGLover posted een jaar geleden
dainel56 said:
I think so 2 and thats 1 of the reasons i dont like the twilght serious
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
DmitryVladimir said:
My Dad's thoughts on that:
"All they want is money. That's the only reason its two parts!"
Mine:
"Pfft.. they just wish they were as cool as Harry Potter!!!"
I bet my dad is right though... =_= either way I'm pretty pissed that I have to put up with two meer Twilight movies.. I say they're biting off HP but who knows.. tis only mua's opinion lol XD
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
actually I think the reason is because the book was too big/long too put into just one movie
JBfan516 posted een jaar geleden
*
That too... I guess..
DmitryVladimir posted een jaar geleden
*
But now I REALLY think its just for the money lol XD
DmitryVladimir posted een jaar geleden
*
i still luveit
baddies posted een jaar geleden
Poberta said:
I think they just want to earn meer money. Thats the reason. Im ok with it in DH and I dont care in BD because I wont watch any of the part.

select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Vixie79 said:
I was thinking about that too. But, I guess Twilight fans want it right like us HP fans did. In order to have a movie be meer accurate based on a book, it has to be spleet, split into parts. If not u would have a 8 to 10 uur movie...lol.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
paloma97ppb said:
YES.

I totally dislike Twilight saga shit. It's annoying.

Harry Potter always. <3
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
your stupid than cause twilight is awesome harry potter sucks
maddiebaby10 posted een jaar geleden
*
I'm stupid cause that's my opinion? Then fuck yes it's okay. :)
paloma97ppb posted een jaar geleden
*
The same could be zei for HP fans erlina41. Most HP fans get awfully nasty with Twilight. fans also. It's actually pretty sad. They're boeken everyone should get over it and. actually give constructive antwoorden instead of "you're stupid" of "Twilight/HP is stupid"!
MGGLover posted een jaar geleden
Sandfire_Paiger said:
No. Breaking Dawn is just as long as Deathly Hallows. They need too to get everything in.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
it was quite a long book
NearRyuzaki posted een jaar geleden
3liiiiin said:
They just want a reason to keep the twilight crazyness going on for another jaar door dragging it out slowly. And I'm sure they got some of the idea from Breaking Dawn.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
isn't that exactly what the HP series is doing? Trying to prolong the adiction. Every movie tries to keep the craziness going.
MGGLover posted een jaar geleden
*
yeah well deathly hallows is probably the longest book i have ever seen and well BD could easily be done in one movie
3liiiiin posted een jaar geleden
*
If u actually checked u would see that The Deathly Hallows book is only FIVE pages longer than the Breaking Dawn book. So do those five extra pages constitute the right for a two part movie over Breaking Dawn?
MGGLover posted een jaar geleden
SacredDawn said:
in a way yes, Harry Potter has so much information to be in just one movie, I didn't think Breaking Dawn had that much going on to be into 2 movies.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
twilighter4evr said:
no breaking dawn is also a really big book and it really needed to be spleet, split into 2 parts along with it being the last of the Twilight Saga just as Deathly Hallows was the end of the Harry Potter series
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
hollywoodluv said:
I zei that straight from the beginning there's no need, BD doesn't even have an epic fight
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Klug said:
I don't think deciding to make a movie into two parts is much of something u can accuse someone of copying another movie... it's a way to spleet, split up a book of series that needs to be done justice in the movie version, as well as making meer money on one book into two films and so they aren't having fans sit through 4 hours to get the movie done, although I would have been meer than willing to watch any Harry Potter movie for 4 hours if they could nail everything that was in the book.

I doubt Twilight will make even close to as much money as Deathly Hallows did, as the Twilight series seems (to me, at least) to have just as many haters as it does fans.

I know the Hunger Games series plans on making the film adaption of the last book, Mockingjay, into a two part movie as well. No copying there, either.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
rantora13 said:
yeah kinda
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
sassy2219 said:
the of auteur of twilight put it in two parts becuase the book was to long to put in 1 movie and why are there many twilight haters
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Because twilight is pointless.
TwinsTwin posted een jaar geleden
*
I can't stand the Twilight movies, they pretty much ruin the boeken (which are a huge improvement!)
LizieBorden posted een jaar geleden
daisygirl488 said:
no! the same thing is happening 4 the hunger games last movie they always (almost) do this 4 the last movies
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
LizieBorden said:
I don't necessarily care about the coping aspect of it, it's meer are fans going to want to wait a jaar to see the conclusion of the first part of Breaking Dawn. I saw the first half of Deathly Hallows when it was first released and I had a hard time waiting the from November until last week to see how it ends. I think its a really dumb verplaats to space them that far apart.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
LOTRlover said:
Well,I see what your saying..it does seem as though they have 'tried' quite like an annoying child phase"I can do anything better than you" attidude,though I CANNOT see the point in comparing the two in any way,especially when it comes to the twilight boeken and harry potter novels...but I know that heavy boeken and heavy novels are being somewhat demanded to be fully screenplay-ed ans stay as close to boeken as possible-and I have NO problem with that,books are so overlooked and dissmissed door many in this dag and age when everything is on a computer screen of tv..lol...even though twilight is not amazing book nor anything riviting,it is still a book and its avid fans have the right to see it fully accomplished on film,as do we which is why Harry Potter 7 was filmed so,though I of course wouldnt have minded 3 films to close out the Era of Harry Potter and his many adventures and family goings-on:) haha
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
MarlenaLovett said:
No.
Just because someone is splitting their film into two parts doesn't meet they're copying. Besides, I don't believe people who work on the Twilight movie would purposefully try to copy off of a big competitor to there's. I think the only reason people seem to think Twilight is copying off of Harry Potter (with the double movies) is because the two are comparted so often.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
baddies said:
I think they not cus they re trying to make theirs
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
sundae407 said:
i think so!
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
lunaginny said:
yeh they copying
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
MGGLover said:
Of course not. As far as Im concerned if Twilight is copying HP then HP has copied every other two part movie created. Just because u do not like the series please do not bring accusations of intentional copying into the mix. It happens, two franchises compete and someone always has a problem with the other. Besides the two series' have nothing in common, so how can u really compare them?This HP-Twilight feud is getting old. I suppose SM wrote Twilight just to copy JKR right? They are two very successful and separate series' so stop the complaining already, it makes u sound like you're younger than u all probably are. Oh and if u must adamantly declare that Twilight is copying please provide a compelling reason and not just "yes because I hate Twilight" I mean seriously. As someone who has a love of both series I really wonder why some of u get so nasty when someone mentions the supposed "rival" of your preferred series.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
TechiTechn said:
Absolutely no n evn if it yes nothinis wrong in it ........
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
nglenn9 said:
No.It's been done before with films other than hp.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Danea said:
No Movie of Production Can Ever, EVER Be as Successful as Harry Potter. People seriously think that the Twilight Saga can beat a Decade Phenomenon? ...Okay let them think so, but
This is true - Harry Potter teaches us story of life, love and the struggles between good and evil.
Twilight teaches girls how to choose between a boyfriend & become pregnant at an early age.
Xxx
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
next question »