beantwoord deze vraag

Harry Potter Vraag

Do u think that "19 Years Later scene" was necessary?

I think it was just stupid 😑
 BTR_Cascada posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Harry Potter Antwoorden

Flickerflame said:
It was important, for the sake of going full circle. The first book includes Harry going off to Hogwarts on the Hogwarts Express for the first time, and the epilogue shows one of his sons doing the same. It's also a mechanism for revealing some details of the characters' futures. I don't think it was necessary from a shipping POV though - each pairing (except Teddy/Victoire) which was shown in that epilogue was already confirmed beforehand.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
anaswill said:
Not necessary, no, but I did like the "bravest man I ever knew" quote.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Lol I felt like that the story can't be continued ever again after that scene 😃
BTR_Cascada posted een jaar geleden
Lackson4ever85 said:
Yeah i think so, and love it :) but for people some not ship the couples i understand its seen importen
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
uimporten
Lackson4ever85 posted een jaar geleden
*
Well I didn't like Harry and Ginny 😐 maybe that's why ☺
BTR_Cascada posted een jaar geleden
*
Together
BTR_Cascada posted een jaar geleden
*
yeah is can be a reason :)
Lackson4ever85 posted een jaar geleden
lililc said:
to stop the shipping,yes it was
though mostly cause to make sure that is the ending and voldemort is dead for good
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
next question »