beantwoord deze vraag

The Phantom Of The Opera Vraag

What is the worst Version of POTO u have seen and why?

The one that comes to mind is the one with Julian Sands,the whole movie was horrible but what makes it worse is that the phantom in this one isn't even disfigured at all,but if u seen worse please tell me.
*
idk
fansfunsz posted een jaar geleden
 Princessofpower posted een jaar geleden
next question »

The Phantom Of The Opera Antwoorden

WildConcerto said:
The restaged US tour going around right now is pretty bad, I mean, don't even get me started on it.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Really? I haven't heard about this is it really bad?
Princessofpower posted een jaar geleden
*
Well… basically, u have the original ALW musical, only, the characterizations are changed. Every redeeming quality the Phantom had is shoved away: in the first unmasking, Christine wakes up, and pats him on the shoulder instead of unmasking him. The thing is, he’s busy washing his face, and he becomes all violent and grabs her door the hair while, sheesh, it isn’t her fault. And furthermore, in the Final Lair, there’s a part where he gets so pissed off he actually seizes her and flings her on his bed in a way it reminds me way too much of sexual assault. Christine is really passive and weak-willed, and the way she antwoorden to the Phantom’s abuse is… kissing him and being seemingly sad of leaving him? Well, unless she pities him meer than anything else, but hey, I hope it’s the case, because it just looks like romanticizing violence and abuse to me. Raoul is a total douche, so is Meg at times, in a way it looks like they’re trying to build bridges with Love Never Dies. And I’m supposed to believe in this context Christine goes back to a man who was violent and abusive with her to sleep with him? Plus, the staging can pretty weird: I mean, in muziek of the Night, u have the Phantom blindfolding Christine during “close your eyes and surrender to your darkest dreams” which reminds me of something else and leaves me uneasy, and then, during “Floating, falling, sweet intoxication”, he starts waltzing with her Titanic style, which could be actually sort of nice if in the end, he didn’t just let Christine randomly flop on the ground. Fail. Furthermore, the costumes are pretty floppy and sad and Christine is there doing loads of headache acting to the point u wonder if they really wanted to toon that she does have some mental illness, though the US tour got better since the UK tour who got the same staging.
WildConcerto posted een jaar geleden
*
Wow they make Erik seem like a sexually abusive man I know he is not meant to be a saint but yeah not very nice for some reason it sounds like 50 shades of grey phantom style and I don't like 50 shades of grey
Princessofpower posted een jaar geleden
*
I know, right? I mean, no, I'm not that person who'll be there excusing everything Erik did, but still, there's a to everything.
WildConcerto posted een jaar geleden
scarletunicorn said:
The Julian Sands movie is pretty lulzy to watch.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Yeah I find it creepy but can see where your coming from I really don't understand why they decided for him to not be disfigured and be raised door rats which is also another creepy thing about it
Princessofpower posted een jaar geleden
TBUGoth said:
Phantom of the Mall
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
fansfunsz said:
idk
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
goodmorningerik said:
I think it has to be the Dario Argento version because really like he had no disfigurement very much creepy and...well out of place xD that's it
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
DONT EVEN GET ME STARTED! OH MY GOD THAT ONE WAS HORRIBLE!!!
TheRatKing1 posted een jaar geleden
spiritfan1 said:
Lon Chaney's version is the worst I've seen
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
what??? HOW??? That's like THE version, seconde only to the ORIGINAL BOOK
TheRatKing1 posted een jaar geleden
TheRatKing1 said:
I'd have to say it's the Australian version of the sequel, "Love Never Dies". Technically, it's a version of POTO, and it has the characters...but man was that one awful. I much preferred the version with Sierra Boggess and Ramin Karimloo. It was just....cheapened and tawdry. (Though they should have been set in 1891, both of them, since the original story is 1881)


But if u want to know the worst version of POTO itself, I'd have to say is the Dario Andretti version. What the hell was he thinking when he made that?? Psychic phantoms with long hair raised door rats? What the hell??
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Yes I seen that version Julian sands played the phantom in that I don't know why he made him psychic let alone raised door rats also he wasn't even disfigured in the movie.
Princessofpower posted een jaar geleden
next question »