V for Vendetta Antwoorden
|
AnnabethC1376 said:
Yes I think it was because if V wasn't killed then the uprising wouldn't haven't meent as much to everyone.It shows how he believed in what he was doing enough to even give his life for it.
|
|
|
Black_cat_ said:
Of course it gave it impact, otherwise the ending would of been dul if V, the girl and everyone in the town rose up against the government and then thats it
|
|
|
hippieman said:
To say that any gegeven twist of plot is 'necessary' is to stifle imagination and creative freedom. It would have been a perfectly legitimate ending to have V survive, marry Evey and live happily ever after. But then again, this is an ALAN MOORE comic! And for him, this is pretty cheery. Cheerier than Watchmen anyways. At least the hero wins, even though he dies.
|
|
|
Original-Ghost said:
"Anarchy wears two faces, both creator and destroyer. Thus destroyers topple empires: make a canvas of clean rubble where creators can then build a better world. Rubble, once achieved, makes further ruins' means irrelevant. Away with our explosives, then! Away with our destroyers! They have no place within our better world." Page 222 of the V for Vendetta comic, answering this vraag before it even came about. "But let us raise a geroosterd brood, toast to all our bombers, all our bastards, most unlovely and most unforgivable. Let's drink their health...then meet with them no more." Short answer: Yes.
|
|