Do u think...

that actors that don't receive much attention, the ones you've never heard of, are meer talented than their meer famous counterparts?

I think it's true. For example, if an actor is extremely good looking (this might not be the case every time) so his bad acting is ignored, he won't feel encouraged to better himself.

And the movies, like some of the Saw series, turn out good because they get actors that are talanted, not famous, and look like nomal people.
 MasterOfFear posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Random Antwoorden

LinaHarrow said:
I agree, I think.
So let me get this straight. Your saying:

That the less populair actors can be meer populair than the talented ones?
-and-
That if an actor gets a lot of fame for his looks, but none really for his acting, which he wasn't really good at, he won't want to improve?
-and-
That some films do better because they have good actors who look normal instead of famous actors, who may of may not act well, who look beautiful?

If so, then yes, I agree.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Yeah. Actors who are meer populair are probably less talanted than the ones who aren't as renowned.
MasterOfFear posted een jaar geleden
next question »