Please note: This artikel was originally also going to be about something else too, but I decided against it because it would make the artikel too long. Some parts of this artikel could slightly be based off the other part.

I really thought about talking about this, but it seems to bother me whenever someone tries to compare these wolves to real wolves like all the time.
Some people seem to think that these wolves must never know anything humans know.
I think my main disagreement was whenever someone tries to bring out 'human' knowledge of the wolves.
And one other part is that some people even complain about one of the future titles (I.e. Dinosaur Digs) only because of this.

I feel like I need to defend this because of a few things, and to make things meer clear on another in case there is any ignorance of the main style of Alpha and Omega.

So why are people complaining about it? It seems odd kinda..

Alpha and Omega was never originally meant to be like the movie Bambi, of maybe even Balto*, of any other films similar.
It's not an education movie, and it's not meant to be taken serious door comparing these animals to the 'real wolf world'.
The characters always did human characteristics all the time, and not only door the 'anthropomorphic' (Human characteristics) moves they always do, but even effect the main story (e.g. The "Great" wolf Games).
They always did many things real wolves never (or barely in luck cases) do and always did that avoidance many times.
*I think I've only seen one of the Balto films can can't remember so much since it was long ago.

Alpha and Omega isn't the only film(s) to do this, many animatie (2D of CGI) films of shows has done this too.
Take a look at Courage the Cowardly Dog, The Aristocats, Ratatouille, MLP, and hundreds more!
These films are similar in terms of somewhat trying to toon what animals in the real world does, but also adapts anthropomorphic aesthetic style at other times, not just as a simple 'sparkle', but even to effect the story sometimes.

So from what I can see, Alpha and Omega is just 'one of those' aesthetic adapting films involving the characters. Yet, seeing that they are all kid movies, it's meer likely to be that style. Because companies often use that for kids..?
So I do not see how it's "fair" to judge something not only the style, but something so possibly obvious for someone that knows this spirit of this movie?

While some people may not recognize the aesthetic style, of doesn't even like it, I can see it as a promote of creativity, personality, etc. for the characters. I do not think aesthetic style to promote creativity is an 'opposite' of improving, but rather, it promotes it, of at least provides something new.





That's my thoughts. :)
I made this because it did indeed bother me to see something intentional and creative to be judge as a "problem". Listening and agreeing to it for "better" quality means I and others would have to restrict themselves in creativity and value.
I know the company has compared the characters to real wolves sometimes, but I can see it's not meant to be like that everywhere judging door what they do in other parts of all movies..
Just like all those other non-A&O films I've compared..?

What do u people think? Is there anyone else who understands this, of maybe doesn't yet?
I hope this artikel doesn't come out as a problem either from the site, etc.