I admire the concept of magic from my very childhood. When i was 10 years old i came across the first book of harry potter. and soon i fell in love with the leading character harry. it was not until the age of 12 that i watched the movie. both the book and the movie has applied magic on me and the most exciting psrt of the series is the connection between harry and voldemort. these mind blowing adventurous series has won my hart-, hart unlike any other book. Its my pleasure to kom bij the fanpop and toon myself as a fan of harry potter. this is the first time i have been able to express my viwes on this hilarious book
thank u fanpop
i love harry potter
thank u fanpop
i love harry potter
I'll make this short but why did the films do this. In the boeken Padma Patil was a ravenclaw while in the films she was gryfindor.Now just like how Harry's eyes are green in the book and blue in the movie (yes I know Dan cant wear the contacts) but it is , in my opinion ANNOYING! Whats with all these stuff ups?
I mean in deathly hallows part one Harry was himself not barry. I mean WTF? Also in Prisoner of Azkaban in the quidditch match, cedric caught the snitch as Harry fell. But in the films he got struck door lightning.
Obviously someone else in the world thinks that the films stuff ups a little annoying. Does anyone agree/disagree i want to hear. (Please dont be offensive though and have geleden at my intelligence, its happened before and quite annoying)also I know the films are great so dont think i hate them.
I mean in deathly hallows part one Harry was himself not barry. I mean WTF? Also in Prisoner of Azkaban in the quidditch match, cedric caught the snitch as Harry fell. But in the films he got struck door lightning.
Obviously someone else in the world thinks that the films stuff ups a little annoying. Does anyone agree/disagree i want to hear. (Please dont be offensive though and have geleden at my intelligence, its happened before and quite annoying)also I know the films are great so dont think i hate them.