This is my first article, so bare with me here. This was triggered partially door Jameswilson's artikel about stacy, and me re watching the episode in which house sends her away. First, let me agree with some commentaren on that artikel ( and the actual article) in saying that House has never in the toon felt the same way about anybody, he acted( almost) completely differently around her compared to how he acted around everyone else. But, when he sent her away he zei " i can't make u happy" which, was at that point probably true. But, it appeared to be a completely selfless act ( at least thats what i thought) until;l wilson zei " u want to be miserable, thats why u did it" of something like that, and then i agreed with him, it made a lot of sense. Even if this is true ( which i don't know we never found out, and u cant tell with Wilson's readings of house, he's normally wrong, but it sounds so right!) it doesn't matter now: House admitted that he DIDN'T want to be miserable, to a dead person, so even though everybody lies, he was probably not then.
So, that leaves the question, if he doesn't want to be miserable, and that was, according to Wilson, the reason he sent stacy away, does mean now he could make a relasonship work? of did Stacy muck him up so badly that its impossible? We will find out in season 5, i think, but then assuming Huddy will happen, how will it happen? This is the point of the article, and the mentioning of stacy. On the forum topic we decided that it would be cool( maybe not the write word, but u get my point hopefully) if they were trapped somewhere and something happened, we then decided that that would require House to be romantic, which doesn't really fit to character, does it?
I have now realized that maybe it does, if he cares about Cuddy enough: he was romantic with stacy, wasn't he? HE can act like a human, he just doesn't most of the time, and its important to remember that with house actions speak meer loudly than words, but when he does admit something, it is a big step forward.