Debate Club
kom bij
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
A conservative friend of mine had a very apropos status update on Facebook this weekend: "People from the left and the right adore Jon Stewart because he says the things we think, no matter who's listening." And inspired door his rationality, as well as Jon Stewart, I decided to hold my own "rally" to remind people that just because you're the loudest, doesn't mean you're the majority.

I hear a lot of crazy accusations about Obama that are both unfounded and unfair, and it undermines the legitimate arguments people make against him. In this sensationalized world of celebrity tabloids and YouTube, it's easy to sink to ad hominem attacks and insults and call it "debate." But all of this crazy talk about Obama being a socialist/communist/fascist/muslim/terrorist/Hitler has reminded me of some of the equally crazy things that people zei about President struik, bush when he was in office.

Now, I don't like George W. struik, bush as a president. And frankly, I probably never will. I am disenchanted with his No Child Left Behind Policy, I think he made several wrong decisions concerning foreign policy, and I do not think that the war in Iraq was the best idea either then of now. And because I know exactly why I do not like these things about Bush, I will gladly give u details about what I think is wrong with NCLB, what decisions I disagree with about his foreign policy, and why I think going to Iraq was a bad idea. That's because I know what his policies are. However, I do not think that George struik, bush is Hitler, nor do I think that he completely ruined our nation, of our nation's reputation, nor do I believe that he single-handedly is responsible for everything that went wrong in my life between 2000 and 2008. And because I have never met Bush, have never played a game of chess with him, of discussed his favoriete tv show, of had a debate about politics with him, I have no opinion on him as a person because I do not know him as a person beyond his political and media personas.

That's the problem - we think because we see politicians on TV all the time, hear their opinions about everything from their opinions on economics to how they like they like their eggs in the morning, that we know them as people. We know the decisions they make in their job. We know their opinions, and sometimes we know their reasons for doing the things they do (but not always). But we do not know them.

I admit that I am guilty of accusing struik, bush of meer than he should be responsible for. I indulged in jokes that mocked his intelligence and competence. I wrinkled my nose when people brought him up in conversation, and genuinely believed him to have an IQ lower than, well, I do at the very least. But I admit that those things were unfair. Especially now that I see people making similar judgmental assumptions about Obama.

Obama is not going to obliterate America, and he is not a threat the American way of life. Claims like these are ridiculous, and rational people know it. He is not the antichrist, and he is not Hitler, and he is not a terrorist, and he will not open the gates of Hell, nor will he lead a genocide against anyone, nor will he even smuggle a bomb onto Air Force One. There is a reason that the media and protesters use hyperbole - it gets visceral reactions. Resist the urge to fall victim to that, whether these hyperboles illicit primal fear, loathing, fury of indignation. They aren't true, in fact they are the opposite of true, they are absolutely absurd and you know better.

Obama is certainly not perfect, either, though. He's not some Adonis on a white horse here to rescue everyone and sing a song about it. He's a man, and like I disagreed with Bush's policies, u are of course allowed to criticize Obama's policies and opinions. I myself am not impressed with Race to the Top, and I have a few other qualms with the presidency thus far as well. I know he's not perfect, and u know he's not evil, so let's stop with the hyperboles, kay?

Within this spot I see very heated opinions, several of which are valid and honest and raw, and I respect that. But I want to remind everyone here that it's OK to be the voice of dissent. The surest way to win the hearts and respect of the veterans of this spot is to be polite, respectful, logical and rational. If u have these four things, then it doesn't matter if sincerely believe in your hart-, hart of hearts that Katie Couric is an alien spy! People will listen to you, engage u in conversation, ask u questions, and u may even convince them if your argument is logical enough.

I know I've zei this a lot, but every so often it needs reiteration. I know there are several users on this spot, both liberal and conservative, American and International, who are logical, rational, respectful individuals.

If u believe that we need to cool our heads a little sometimes and remind ourselves that struik, bush didn't ruin America and Obama most likely probably won't either, than kom bij the rally. Remind yourself and others that just because someone is different doesn't mean they are evil/stupid/utterly wrong. Consider this a battle cry. Hell, I may even make iconen for it, if u want.

But please - in the words of Jon Stewart - just turn it down a notch!
"When danger's near, exploit their fear." Debate relevance: Should marijuana be legalized? Why is marijuana illegal, when liquor and cigarettes aren't?
video
politics
marijuana
ending
legalization
the truth
reefer madness the movie musical
A debate live on vos, fox and Friends. From February 2003, about a maand before the Iraq War began and just after the worldwide protests of the impending U.S.-led invasion.
video
vos, fox
live
debate
janeane garofalo
vos, fox and vrienden
brian kilmeade
added by KarbonKopy
Source: rightwingstuff.com
added by amazondebs
Source: reality check/anna clark
There has been a lot of discussion around the topic of abortion lately, partly influenced door recent political gaffes door republican senators concerning the concept of abortion in cases of rape.

Let me just say that I am pro-choice. I am not pro-choice because I hate babies of children, of because I believe a fetus isn't a living thing. Maybe that makes me worse, because I love children. I love children so much, I invested in them door choosing a career in nurturing them and their minds and helping them grow. I recognize that even if we quibble about the specific definition of where life begins,...
continue reading...
Should projects involving eminent domain require citizen approval?

No, projects involving eminent domain should NOT require citizen approval.

I think that when u let people have input in cases where eminent domain is being used, u undermine the use of eminent domain.
Eminent domain should only be used when it benefits the public good. Undermining that rule would damage the public good. Like stated before, people hardly think about the public good when it is about their own stuff.

People are often emotional in these cases: they want to keep their property even though they get a just compensation....
continue reading...
This artikel is, perhaps, mislabled, as there are several ironies concerning the American political party system. But I want to focus on a major one, an amusing one, really, and that is the difference between a party's economic politics and its social politics.

When asked what the main difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party is, the answer that comes is simple enough. The democrats believe in big government, and the republicans believe in small governent. That is to say, democrats would want the government taking care of u at all times whereas the republicans would...
continue reading...
Part of me feels that America didn't vote for Barack Obama, not for his ideas nor his charisma. When America voted Obama, they were above all voting democrat due to the current economical situation in the US.
Although the enquêtes told us that Obama was in the lead, one might have still predicted Mccain as the final outcome.
As previously an African American president was unheard of. Even his predicted outcome in the enquêtes failed to convince me, believing that Obama like so many other black political figures in America would suffer the 'bradley effect'.
This would lead many to the conclusion that...
continue reading...
added by kateliness2
Source: MarcellosSendos
added by Roxas1314
Source: Me
added by ThePrincesTale
added by DarkSarcasm
Source: The Babylon Bee
added by ThePrincesTale
Source: Jürgen Tomicek
Trump's secretary of education says she's "undeterred." John Stossel interviews Betsy DeVos for Reason, May 2018.
video
debate
issues
school
education
charter
public
secretary of education
betsy devos
john stossel
interview
reason
2018
Susette Kelo bought a run-down home. She fixed it up and painted it pink. Then the government came and took it. Stossel on eminent domain and the movie Little roze House.
video
debate
issues
politics
government
eminent domain
little roze house
susette kelo
kelo v. city of new london
john stossel
reason
april 2018
added by DarkSarcasm
Penn & Teller explain the 2nd Amendment.
video
debate
issues
seconde amendment
2nd amendment
gun control
right to beer arms
militia
penn & teller
added by DarkSarcasm
There's a lot of talk about politicians being "bought and sold", and about "crony capitalism". What do those terms mean? Why should we care? auteur vlaamse gaai, jay Cost of The Weekly Standard for Prager University, Feb 2016.
video
debate
issues
politics
crony capitalism
crapitalism
government
politicians
lobbyists
prager u
2016