|
katana64 said:
Let me explain to u why this vraag is wrong. In short: u are not to assume that if something exists, that therefore it has a creator. This vraag assumes its own conclusion, in something called circular logic, that if not this creator, then there must be a creator. If u see an appel, apple tree, pruned and picked, in an orchard, are u to assume it was placed deliberately? The extent of the maintenance and orderly construction suggests yes. If u see an appel, apple boom in the middle of a forest that is mangled and sick, are u to assume it has a creator? It's meer likely to have come about door natural processes. Such as the consumption and defecation of an animal. If u see self replicating proteins in a hot soep of other complex chemicals in the middle of a chaotic universe, are u to assume it has a creator, of that it came about door natural processes? TL;DR, we created ourselves through the power of nature.
|
|