Debate
What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)
Debate Can u like/support an artist/actor/musician/etc. even if they aren't a morally sound person?
16 fans picked: |
It depends what they did/are doing
|
|||
Yes, but I'll only like their work, I won't support it
|
|||
Yes, I their work takes priority
|
|||
No, their actions speak louder than their work
|
|
Make your pick! | next poll >> |
Jokes aside, by this I mean; there are so many artists that are just brilliant but their actions are morally grey at best and unlawful at worst. Do you still think that it's okay/possible to support them. Be it something like older works that are a product of their time (ie. they have racist aspects) or someone like Davhie who is known to have assaulted fans.
By 'Yes, but I'll only like their work, I won't support it' I mean that I'll still listen to their music or read their books and so on but I won't support them by buying the book or buying albums and merch.
Blood On The Dance Floor is a guilty pleasure band for me. Their music is so shitty but it's so catchy. But Davhie has 21 alleged sexual assault claims (form underage fans mind you) to his name and is even being investigated by the 'To Catch A Predator' host.
They're both awful but I still like their music. But after finding out about what they've done and how they act you won't catch me buying another album anytime soon.
Will answer this properly when I get time :'(
Like, is that person just casually into "alternative medicine"? I might side-eye it, but eh. Whatever.
Or is this person actively using their influence and cash to promote "alternative medicine" and profit off of it? (Lookin at you, Paltrow). Then yeah, I don't want my money going to that.
Similarly, dead artists are a whole other category. I love Roald Dahl's books, despite the fact that he was a vocal anti-Semite. It helps, though, that he's dead - and cannot actively advance his anti-Semitic views (also that his estate has link for these views). Deplorable views to be sure, but you can't hold someone accountable who is dead, and he can't do any further harm now. Then again, I'm not Jewish. I'm not the target of Dahl's hatred. So I also have the privilege of being able to more easily dismiss it.
But someone who is still alive, though, they should be held accountable. Someone whose using their wealth and influence to harm people definitely doesn't deserve any more of my money - even if I love their works.
Good point about the distinction between people long-dead vs. people who are still alive and can be held accountable
teken in of kom bij fanpop om uw commentaar toe te voegen