I recently found a strange contradiction in the concept of wizarding money.I'd like to know if my idea is true of if there is a counter-argument against it.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured door magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured door magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
My friend just zei twilight is better than harry potter!
Here is our convo:
"So twihard of potter head ? We both know who's better" Me
"Yhea"
Potters
Twilight
I think not!
Oh yhea!?
Yhea! And to prove u are wrong... I challenge u to a dule!
Your on!
And also... whoever wins is the better non-fiction fan.
*after much explaining we step into dule positions*
u go first. Me
Ok! I turn into a werewolf!
Avada Kerdavra the werewolf.
*she runs off crying*
I think she's crazy. So your opinion. Hp of Twilight?