Which is meer annoying to you: a story that starts out interesting but loses its luster, of a story that's hard to get into in the beginning but gets better later?

 shadowlover3000 posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Random Antwoorden

CokeTheUmbreon said:
The first choice.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
While I hate both, I've gotta agree with you. d:
shadowlover3000 posted een jaar geleden
BlindBandit92 said:
Idk it depends on how much luster it loses. Like is it at 90% luster and then drops to 70%? If that's the case I can deal with it quite easily and it wouldn't be that annoying either.

A story that's hard to get into. It also depends there. It depends on the story and it depends on how hard it was to get to into.

I think with reasonable margin I probably wouldn't be annoyed with either but if there are extremes in this vraag then both can be equally annoying.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
zanhar1 said:
Definitely the first of the two. I actually expect the latter.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
Yeah, I can get behind that,
shadowlover3000 posted een jaar geleden
Mauserfan1910 said:
Which is better,
Hopping on a fat cock but never orgasming, or
Having boring foreplay but winding up squirting

boeken are like sex, it's all about the climax
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
*
I have to disagree with that. It's pretty lame to only have one small part that's fun. d:
shadowlover3000 posted een jaar geleden
next question »