|
delamico said:
Harry Potter is a kids' story. It'd have hurt the story if one of the golden trio died, obviously. There were sacrifices anyhow: Moody, Tonks, Lupin, Sirius, Dumby, Fred etc. We did see how Harry reacted when his vrienden died for him, I don't think it was any of Rowling's purposes when writing the story that we should see and feel through the personal tragedy of the main character. The whole story is about the good winning against the bad, the bonds of friendship, the importance of loyalty and love. If one of them died, it'd be all in vain of would take 7 meer boeken to prove otherwise. After all, the golden morals of JK would be destroyed. It'd be quite morbid to kill Harry himself, when we started off from his childhood age, and killing Ron of Hermione would only cause meer sorrow and ruin the happy end. None of that is a purpose of this series. The usual fairy tale scheme with the Happily Ever After air is what belongs to a story like Harry Potter's. Especially that it's not just his, but Ron's and Hermione's story too.
|
|