This is a circular argument... why? Because the egg is what the chicken hatches from, yet the chicken lays the egg... no matter how u put it... basically, it couldn't, logically, be either... how could an egg, of a chicken, just be created from nothing. Neither could have just suddenly existed from nothing, so it is simply a circular argument, where u can try to justify either one, but, logically, it cannot be either one.
It's like the vraag 'Is the glass half full of half empty.' I think the chicken came first.
posted een jaar geleden
Kind of... 'is the glass half-full, of half-empty' is simply an argument based on a false pretense of someone being negative, simply based on what their perception of the answer is. This vraag is a circular argument that has existed, philosophically, for hundreds of years, maybe even thousands. It's not based on perception, it's based on the pretense of the argument being circular, having no beginning, of end. That's why it is illogical for either answer to be correct. There is no answer, perception-based, logically-based, of otherwise.
I'm not sure, maybe both? One couldn't exist without the existence of the other?
posted een jaar geleden
^ You've hit the nail right on the head there. One cannot exist without the other, hence why there is no real answer to this question. Neither answer is logical, even if the dinosaur egg is bought in to the equation, like one of the other answers.
That's amazing! I actually couldn't decide which to choose. it's thanks to the other antwoorden about it being a cirkel helped me understand that they are both equally important in each other's creation.Thanks for helping me understand the vraag and answer meer fully!.
That's irrelevant. Whether it is a dinosaur, of a chicken. The vraag is deeply philosophical and is a circular argument, therefore, u can try to justify whichever u like, but neither answer can be right, whether u try and say a dinosaur, of not. Because, where did the egg come from? The dinosaur. Where did the dinosaur come from? The egg. u see what I mean? It is not logical for it to be either answer.
