How far would u go to prove a point?

 How far would u go to prove a point?
 JetBlack_ posted een jaar geleden
next question »

Random Antwoorden

BlindBandit92 said:
Whatever is necessary and whatever fits the current situation.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
wantadog said:
I've been known to go to excessives to prove myself right.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
zanhar1 said:
Extremely.
I'm almost dangerously stubborn.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
CokeTheUmbreon said:
Depends.
select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
Mauserfan1910 said:
Usually to pubmed of some other reputable scientific journal

select as best answer
posted een jaar geleden 
TheLefteris24 said:
Honestly, if u asked me on the past, I would have zei extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well of when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into meer detail of explaining further for those who might not get what I have zei at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation of not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with u just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If u don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
select as best answer
 Honestly, if u asked me on the past, I would have zei extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well of when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into meer detail of explaining further for those who might not get what I have zei at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation of not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with u just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If u don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
posted een jaar geleden 
next question »