why do the boeken not mach the films ?

When boeken are adapted into movies, the portrayal usually isn't too accurate. So, this is to be expected.

With the Twilight books, each of them are 500 pgs of more, and an average screenplay is 114 pages of somewhere around there. Squeezing all the book pages into 100+ pages is hard to do. However, the screenwriter for the Twilight films fails to convey the emotions of the book.

Also, the director is to blame as well. Their vision is incorporated into their filming and production; their camera shots and how they want the scene to viewed, editing, etc.

Also, the actors are to blame as well. They sometimes understand their character, and play it to how they think the character is portrayed, but since the fans interpret the characters differently and to their own accord, it's hard for the actors to please everyone.

And, typical Hollywood. Hollywood manages to skew things. Pimps it up, sells eye candy. Whatever they think will sell.

Because the book has meer detail, and the directors try to visualize how the movie is gonna be

There are just too many details in the book. They cant fit it all in the film. All films based off boeken are like that...

idk?????

Because they don't have the same description!

b/c supposedly boeken has way too much to put into the movie and they had to cut it a lot to include things that were not in the books

I don't think there was ever a movie that was the perfect match to the book it was based off of, not even the Stephen King films and I love SK's work endlessly. :(

cuse sometimes da boeken r 2 loong so they cut out da non important parts so yeah

TEE HEE!