The twilight movie could of been way longer and better if they didnt miss all of the good parts out.. It was WAY TO different than the book.. any1 agree?

in my opinion, if u neglect the book, the movie is great, but if u can't stop thinking about the book ( if u can't detach yourself from it ), well, it sucks then.. they are so many good scenes that aren't in the movie and they would only make the movie better..if u look the book and the movie in two separate ways then they're both great!

Both are great in their own ways and I do agree that the book is slightly better because it came first. It dosn't mean never watch the movie again.. 'cause that would be terrible but I do agree they could've kept things the same in the movie as it was in the book. But to save time and money they adapted it!

i think in order for the movie to flow without losing the movie/conflict aspect of it they needed to cut down on what scenes they were going to use.. the book is over 500 pages! there was no way they could've included it all in detail and still have it make sense at the end, it was just to much plus not to mention they were on tight budget. One of the things i did find lacking about the movie however was that Bella and Edward's relationship was never really potrayed that strongly as in the book.. They never say "i love you" once..

I agree the book is WAY better than the movie they cut out the part where she faints when he kisses her! that part always makes me laugh!!!!!!

yeah i agree but that's just Hollywood making it the way they wanted it. it was still really awesome.:)

shut up man the movie was sick poo you